Instead of requiring the hsspi clock to have a rate, allow using a second
clock for providing the Hz rate, which is probably more correct anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c
index 55789f7cda92..79096d17ebde 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c
@@ -351,8 +351,16 @@ static int bcm63xx_hsspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(clk);
rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
- if (!rate)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!rate) {
+ struct clk *pll_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pll");
+
+ if (IS_ERR(pll_clk))
+ return PTR_ERR(pll_clk);
+
+ rate = clk_get_rate(pll_clk);
+ if (!rate)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
if (ret)
--
2.11.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
