On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:35:55PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 02/01/17 at 11:30am, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:23:31AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:20:53AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:10:59PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > > > > On 01/31/17 at 12:19am, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jelle, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 02:49:46PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:57:14PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > > > > > > > > I also have been looking at you previosu submission and had some draft > > > > > > > > > changes. I reconciled them in the patch below, if it still works for you > > > > > > > > > then I'll fold everything together and apply. Please let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll find some time to test the patch below, I've one small suggestion > > > > > > > > to the patch below. > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be very helpful if you let me know if the patch actually works > > > > > > on the hardware: the merge window for 4.11 will be opening fairly soon. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I had a busy week and at first it didn't work since I didn't have > > > > > a regulator and I think the code for the regular might be wrong. > > > > > > > > > > I think that you want the regulators to be optional, but > > > > > devm_regulator_get_optional errors out when no vcc/vio is configured. > > > > > Changing it to devm_regulator_get makes the driver work. I guess this is > > > > > since devm_regulator_get_optional doesn't allow the creation of a dummy > > > > > device while devm_regulator_get does. > > > > > > > > Ah, yes, these should have been non-optional. I'll fix it up and apply > > > > then. > > > > > > Hmm.. but no, we only acess regulators if they are non-NULL in > > > zet6223_power_on(). I used devm_regulator_get_optional() to avoid > > > needless sleep in zet6223_power_on() when we do not have regulators > > > defined. Let me look some more... > > > > What is the error you are getting from devm_regulator_get_optional()? > > What kind of system is that? Do you have system with full constraints? > > The system is an ARM tablet, I don't know what regulator it uses for the > touchscreen (since I don't have any schematics). > > The error I get is: > > [ 1.274337] zet6223 1-0076: failed to get 'vio' regulator: -19 OK, I see what is going on. I CCed you on a mail to Mark Brown regarding regulator_get_optional(), depending on his response we'll know the way forward. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
