Hi Matthias, On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 19:45 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Hi Rick, > > > > On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote: > >> Hi Hans, > >> > >> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have > >> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge > >> the source code and dt-binding first? > > > > Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason > > it hasn't been merged yet? > > > > If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media > > patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle. > > > > If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is > > merged. > > > > I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems > that it got never posted. > > Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds > a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi? > James sent three MT2701 dts patches [1] two weeks ago, these three patches include scpsys node. Please take a reference. And We will send new MT2701 ionmmu/smi dtsi node patch base on [1] later, thus you can accept and merge to 4.11. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489991/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489985/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489989/ Thanks, Eddie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
