Hi Rick, On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote: > Hi Hans, > > The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have > any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge > the source code and dt-binding first? Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason it hasn't been merged yet? If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle. If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is merged. Regards, Hans > > Best Regards, > Rick > > On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 17:43 +0800, Rick Chang wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 09:54 +0800, Rick Chang wrote: >>> Hi Hans, >>> >>> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:43 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>>> On 22/11/16 04:21, Rick Chang wrote: >>>>> Hi Hans, >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>>>>> On 17/11/16 04:38, Rick Chang wrote: >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rick Chang <rick.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> This patch depends on: >>>>>>> CCF "Add clock support for Mediatek MT2701"[1] >>>>>>> iommu and smi "Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701"[2] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-October/007271.html >>>>>>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9164013/ >>>>>> >>>>>> I assume that 1 & 2 will appear in 4.10? So this patch needs to go in >>>>>> after the >>>>>> other two are merged in 4.10? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Hans >>>>> >>>>> [1] will appear in 4.10, but [2] will appear latter than 4.10.So this >>>>> patch needs to go in after [1] & [2] will be merged in 4.11. >>>> >>>> So what should I do? Merge the driver for 4.11 and wait with this patch >>>> until [2] is merged in 4.11? Does that sound reasonable? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Hans >>> >>> What do you think about this? You merge the driver first and I send this >>> patch again after [1] & [2] is merged. >> >> BTW, to prevent merging conflict, the dtsi should be merged by mediatek >> SoC maintainer, Matthias.I think we can only take care on the driver >> part at this moment. >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html