On 12/02/2016 10:45 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Rob, any response on this one? I see you have acked the reset part of the >> bindings which is doing pretty much the same thing as the clock part is >> doing here, namely adding child node under the main SCI node. Is it okay to >> do this same for other parts of the TI SCI? > Yes. It would be silly to allow for one and not others... > I'm expecting a respin for the node name (clocks or clock-controller). I'll also make a review pass on patch 3 today so please don't respin until after that. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
