Hi,
On Wednesday 04 December 2013 10:46 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Some Marvell SoCs have a SATA PHY which can be powered off, in order
> to save power. Make use of the generic phy framework to control these
> phys.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> index 56be31819897..9a728bcfbb9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/ata_platform.h>
> #include <linux/mbus.h>
> @@ -563,6 +564,12 @@ struct mv_host_priv {
> struct clk *clk;
> struct clk **port_clks;
> /*
> + * Some devices have a SATA PHY which can be enabled/disabled
> + * in order to save power. These are optional: if the platform
> + * devices does not have any phy, they won't be used.
> + */
> + struct phy **port_phys;
> + /*
> * These consistent DMA memory pools give us guaranteed
> * alignment for hardware-accessed data structures,
> * and less memory waste in accomplishing the alignment.
> @@ -4076,6 +4083,11 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!hpriv->port_clks)
> return -ENOMEM;
> + hpriv->port_phys = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct phy *) * n_ports,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!hpriv->port_phys)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> host->private_data = hpriv;
> hpriv->n_ports = n_ports;
> hpriv->board_idx = chip_soc;
> @@ -4097,6 +4109,9 @@ static int mv_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> hpriv->port_clks[port] = clk_get(&pdev->dev, port_number);
> if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->port_clks[port]))
> clk_prepare_enable(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
> + hpriv->port_phys[port] = devm_phy_get(&pdev->dev, port_number);
once you change the phy-names in dt data, corresponding change should be done
here too.
> + if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->port_phys[port]))
> + phy_power_on(hpriv->port_phys[port]);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -4132,6 +4147,8 @@ err:
> clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
> clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
> }
> + if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->port_phys[port]))
> + phy_power_off(hpriv->port_phys[port]);
> }
>
> return rc;
> @@ -4161,6 +4178,8 @@ static int mv_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> clk_disable_unprepare(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
> clk_put(hpriv->port_clks[port]);
> }
> + if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->port_phys[port]))
> + phy_power_off(hpriv->port_phys[port]);
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
Apart from that comment this patch looks good.
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
