On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:10:41AM +0100, Jamie Lentin wrote: > On 2016-09-12 23:03, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >>Maybe we can instead leave out the PCI support from the new > >>file for now and not delete the legacy board file? > > This seems a reasonable compromise. The PCI card the router comes > with isn't supported by mwl8k mainline anyway (There's STA-only > firmware that can be extracted from a windows driver and PCI IDs > added, but stats reporting uses a different format), so it's not a > huge loss, although many did replace the card with something > Atheros-based. O.K. So dropping the PCI code gets us going forward. Have we missed the merge window? > Unfortunately the power regulator on my spare router has stopped > regulating, which will make more development tricky. The Green Light of death? > >Jamie, which interrupt do you see the WiFi card using? If it is > >IRQ_ORION5X_PCIE0_INT, (1 + 11), that is probably easier to deal with > >than if it uses GPIO 4. > > Definitely uses GPIO 4. O.K, that makes it more interesting. As far as i can see, no other PCIe system uses a GPIO for its interrupt. There is no core support for this, or any bus driver doing it. So there is no binding to follow. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
