Rob,
On 09/07/2016 10:35 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 07-09-16, 09:36, Dave Gerlach wrote:
On 09/07/2016 12:12 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 31-08-16, 21:53, Dave Gerlach wrote:
+In 'operating-points-v2' table:
+- compatible: Should be
+ - 'operating-points-v2-ti-am3352-cpu' for am335x SoCs
+ - 'operating-points-v2-ti-am4372-cpu' for am43xx SoCs
+ - 'operating-points-v2-ti-dra7-cpu' for dra7xx/am57xx SoCs
Why do you need SoC specific compatible here? Are you defining new
fields in OPP tables for your SoC ? How are the tables for your case
going to differ from the ones using "operating-points-v2" compatible
string?
I thought you had suggested that I do this in your comments from v1, but I
guess that was dependent on whether or not I put the properties I have
inserted into the cpu node into the operating-points table instead.
Yes.
I still
have gotten no comments from any DT maintainers so I left it as is. I am
still not sure if that is acceptable.
@Rob: Can you please share your views on the new properties being
added to the CPU node ?
I am fine moving the properties in the operating-points-v2 node or
leaving it as is, whichever is preferred.
Viresh, thanks for your comments.
Regards,
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
