Hi Philipp,
On 09/09/2016 03:35 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Am Freitag, den 09.09.2016, 15:19 +0200 schrieb Neil Armstrong:
>> Add new compatible string for reset and sys-ctrl for the Oxford
>> Semiconductor OX820 Support.
>> Drop the OX810SE indices since they moved in a dedicated include file.
>
> Not sure if the OX820 reset controller should be considered "compatible"
> to OX810SE. The register layout and usage is the same, but the reset
> indices are different. Does this warrant a new compatible string, or
> should this be
> compatible = "oxsemi,ox820-reset", "oxsemi,ox810se-reset"?
As indicated on the cover letter, I'll like to have each supported SoC
as a specific compatible, to ease maintaining the drivers and
clarify what HW is supported.
Having an include file per SoC is also part of the process.
>
[...]
>
> Please add a pointer to include/dt-bindings/reset/oxsemi,ox8{10se,20}.h
OK, will do in v2.
>
> Otherwise I'm fine with the series, pending DT maintainer approval.
>
> regards
> Philipp
>
Thanks,
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
