On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:35:53PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Am Freitag, den 09.09.2016, 15:19 +0200 schrieb Neil Armstrong: > > Add new compatible string for reset and sys-ctrl for the Oxford > > Semiconductor OX820 Support. > > Drop the OX810SE indices since they moved in a dedicated include file. > > Not sure if the OX820 reset controller should be considered "compatible" > to OX810SE. The register layout and usage is the same, but the reset > indices are different. Does this warrant a new compatible string, or > should this be > compatible = "oxsemi,ox820-reset", "oxsemi,ox810se-reset"? Correct. Different connections are fine since the connections are described in the DT. However you could have some connections not described, so a new compatible may still be needed for that purpose (in addition to other reasons you do a new compatible for new SoCs). Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
