On Sunday, July 17, 2016 8:44:01 PM CEST Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Bhushan Shah <bshah@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 09:21:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 4:22:07 PM CEST Bhushan Shah wrote: > >> > + > >> > + smd { > >> > + rpm { > >> > + rpm_requests { > >> > + pm8841-regulators { > >> > + s1 { > >> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <675000>; > >> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1050000>; > >> > + }; > >> > >> Maybe add a label at either the rpm_requests or the pm8841-regulators > >> node so you can add properties in the leaf nodes withoutout having to > >> specify the whole path? > > > > Sure, I will adjust patch. > > Please don't. After running into several cases where this would end us > up in having a multitude of nodes each describing just a snippet of > each level we decided not to do so in the general case for the > Qualcomm boards. > > There are a few where we apparently ended up doing so anyways, but for > all other cases of regulators we express the full tree in the dts, so > please follow that so we don't mix the styles too much. Ok, then how about this instead: /smd/rpm/rpm_requests/pm8841-regulators { s1 { regulator-min-microvolt = <675000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1050000>; }; ... }; That avoids the ridiculous intendation level but uses no labels. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html