Hi,
On 03-06-16 13:20, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 02 June 2016 11:01 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Some SoCs have a single phy-hw-block with multiple phys, this is
modelled by a single phy dts node, so we end up with multiple
controller nodes with a phys property pointing to the phy-node
of the otg-phy.
Maybe we should try to model each phy with a separate dt node?
That seems like making things unnecessarily complicated. If we want
to be 100% sure that of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy finds the right
controller, we could add an "int index" parameter to of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy
and make it check that first argument specified to the phandle
used in the controller node matches the passed in index.
And use index == -1 to skip this test.
Regards,
Hans
Thanks
Kishon
Only one of these controllers typically is an otg controller, yet we
were checking the first controller who uses a phy from the block and
then end up looking for a dr_mode property in e.g. the ehci controller.
Instead of looking for nodes with a phy property, look for nodes
with a dr_mode property, so that we actually access the dr_mode property
in a node which has it.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/common/common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/common.c b/drivers/usb/common/common.c
index e3d0161..9806433 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/common/common.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/common/common.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ enum usb_dr_mode of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy(struct device_node *phy_np)
int err;
do {
- controller = of_find_node_with_property(controller, "phys");
+ controller = of_find_node_with_property(controller, "dr_mode");
index = 0;
do {
phy = of_parse_phandle(controller, "phys", index);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
