On 04/22/2016 04:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 09:19 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
>> From: David Rivshin <drivshin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Commit 9e42f715264ff158478fa30eaed847f6e131366b ("drivers: net: cpsw: add
>> phy-handle parsing") saved the "phy-handle" phandle into a new cpsw_priv
>> field. However, phy connections are per-slave, so the phy_node field
>> should
>> be in cpsw_slave_data rather than cpsw_priv.
>>
>> This would go unnoticed in a single emac configuration. But in dual_emac
>> mode, the last "phy-handle" property parsed for either slave would be
>> used
>> by both of them, causing them both to refer to the same phy_device.
>>
>> Fixes: 9e42f715264f ("drivers: net: cpsw: add phy-handle parsing")
>> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> I would suggest this for -stable. It should apply cleanly as far back
>> as 4.4.
>>
>> Changes since v1 [1]:
>> - Rebased (no conflicts)
>> - Added Tested-by from Nicolas Chauvet
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/560326/
>
> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
In my opinion, it will be good to have this patch merged as part of -rc cycle, since
it will fix "NULL pointer dereference" issue with current LKML as reported by Andrew Goodbody.
>
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 13 ++++++-------
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index 42fdfd4..d69cb3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -363,15 +363,14 @@ static inline void slave_write(struct cpsw_slave
>> *slave, u32 val, u32 offset)
>> __raw_writel(val, slave->regs + offset);
>> }
>>
>> struct cpsw_priv {
>> spinlock_t lock;
>> struct platform_device *pdev;
>> struct net_device *ndev;
>> - struct device_node *phy_node;
>> struct napi_struct napi_rx;
>> struct napi_struct napi_tx;
>> struct device *dev;
>> struct cpsw_platform_data data;
>> struct cpsw_ss_regs __iomem *regs;
>> struct cpsw_wr_regs __iomem *wr_regs;
>> u8 __iomem *hw_stats;
>> @@ -1144,16 +1143,16 @@ static void cpsw_slave_open(struct cpsw_slave
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
>>
>> if (priv->data.dual_emac)
>> cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(priv, slave, slave_port);
>> else
>> cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
>> 1 << slave_port, 0, 0, ALE_MCAST_FWD_2);
>>
>> - if (priv->phy_node)
>> - slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, priv->phy_node,
>> + if (slave->data->phy_node)
>> + slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_node,
>> &cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->data->phy_if);
>> else
>> slave->phy = phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_id,
>> &cpsw_adjust_link, slave->data->phy_if);
>> if (IS_ERR(slave->phy)) {
>> dev_err(priv->dev, "phy %s not found on slave %d\n",
>> slave->data->phy_id, slave->slave_num);
>> @@ -1936,20 +1935,19 @@ static void cpsw_slave_init(struct cpsw_slave
>> *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv,
>>
>> slave->data = data;
>> slave->regs = regs + slave_reg_ofs;
>> slave->sliver = regs + sliver_reg_ofs;
>> slave->port_vlan = data->dual_emac_res_vlan;
>> }
>>
[..]
--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
