On 04/22/2016 06:45 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:03:34 +0300 > Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 04/21/2016 09:26 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote: >>> From: David Rivshin <drivshin@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> The phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link properties are mutually exclusive, >>> and only one need be specified. However if phy-handle was specified, an >>> error message would complain about the lack of phy_id or fixed-link. I think, commit message need to be updated. You not only fix log messages - you also fix the issue with of_get_phy_mode(slave_node); which will not be called if phy-handle is used. slave_data->phy_if = of_get_phy_mode(slave_node); ^ see below >>> >>> Also, if phy-handle was specified and the subsequent of_phy_connect() >>> failed, the error message still referenced slaved->data->phy_id, which >>> would be empty. Instead, use the name of the device_node as a useful >>> identifier. >>> >>> Fixes: 9e42f715264f ("drivers: net: cpsw: add phy-handle parsing") >>> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> If would like this for -stable it should apply cleanly as far back >>> as 4.5. It failes on 4.4 due to some context differences, but can be >>> applied with 'git am -C2'. Or, I can produce a separate patch against >>> linux-4.4.y if preferred. >>> >>> Changes since v1 [1]: >>> - Rebased (no conflicts) >>> - Added Tested-by from Nicolas Chauvet >>> - Added Acked-by from Rob Herring for the binding change >>> >>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/560324/ >>> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt | 4 ++-- >>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- >>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt >>> index 28a4781..3033c0f 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt >>> @@ -46,16 +46,16 @@ Optional properties: >>> - dual_emac_res_vlan : Specifies VID to be used to segregate the ports >>> - mac-address : See ethernet.txt file in the same directory >>> - phy_id : Specifies slave phy id >> >> May be the "phy_id" can be marked as deprecated? (while here) >> The recommended property now is "phy-handle". > > I can certainly do that. Perhaps something like this? > - phy_id : Specifies slave phy id (deprecated, use phy-handle) > > Rob, would you have any issues with bundling that? > >> >>> - phy-handle : See ethernet.txt file in the same directory >>> >>> Slave sub-nodes: >>> - fixed-link : See fixed-link.txt file in the same directory >>> - Either the property phy_id, or the sub-node >>> - fixed-link can be specified >>> + >>> +Note: Exactly one of phy_id, phy-handle, or fixed-link must be specified. >>> >>> Note: "ti,hwmods" field is used to fetch the base address and irq >>> resources from TI, omap hwmod data base during device registration. >>> Future plan is to migrate hwmod data base contents into device tree >>> blob so that, all the required data will be used from device tree dts >>> file. >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c >>> index d69cb3f..3c81413 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c >>> @@ -1150,16 +1150,19 @@ static void cpsw_slave_open(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv) >>> if (slave->data->phy_node) >>> slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_node, >>> &cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->data->phy_if); >>> else >>> slave->phy = phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_id, >>> &cpsw_adjust_link, slave->data->phy_if); >>> if (IS_ERR(slave->phy)) { >>> - dev_err(priv->dev, "phy %s not found on slave %d\n", >>> - slave->data->phy_id, slave->slave_num); >>> + dev_err(priv->dev, "phy \"%s\" not found on slave %d\n", >>> + slave->data->phy_node ? >>> + slave->data->phy_node->full_name : >>> + slave->data->phy_id, >>> + slave->slave_num); >> >> Unfortunately, there are some inconsistency between legacy and FDT API :( >> of_phy_connect() will return valid phy_device or NULL, but phy_connect() >> can return valid phy_device or ERR_PTR(). > > Good catch, I hadn't noticed that. It looks like that's actually a more > serious (pre-existing) bug: if of_phy_connect() returns NULL, we'd end > up dereferencing it and pagefaulting. > > How about moving the IS_ERR() check into the phy_connect() case like this: > if (slave->data->phy_node) { > slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_node, > &cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->data->phy_if); [1] > } else { > slave->phy = phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_id, > &cpsw_adjust_link, slave->data->phy_if); > if (IS_ERR(slave->phy)) > slave->phy = NULL; [2] > } > if (!slave->phy) { > dev_err(priv->dev, "phy \"%s\" not found on slave %d\n", > slave->data->phy_node ? > slave->data->phy_node->full_name : > slave->data->phy_id, > slave->slave_num); > } else { > > Since you say the phy_id case is deprecated anyways, I'm not too concerned > about not printing the error code returned by phy_connect() in that case > (especially since it never did so in the past). That lets us still avoid > duplicating the dev_err() itself. I'm not worry too much about duplicating dev_err() - it's always good to know the reason of failure. So, may be for of_phy_connect() [1]: dev_err(priv->dev, "phy \"%s\" not found on slave %d\n", slave->data->phy_node->full_name, slave->slave_num); and for phy_connect() [2]: dev_err(priv->dev, "phy %s not found on slave %d, err %d\n", slave->data->phy_id, slave->slave_num, PTR_ERR(slave->phy)); Mugunthan, any comments? > > >> >> >> >>> slave->phy = NULL; >>> } else { >>> phy_attached_info(slave->phy); >>> >>> phy_start(slave->phy); >>> >>> /* Configure GMII_SEL register */ >>> @@ -2030,15 +2033,19 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_platform_data *data, >>> /* This is no slave child node, continue */ >>> if (strcmp(slave_node->name, "slave")) >>> continue; >>> >>> slave_data->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(slave_node, >>> "phy-handle", 0); >>> parp = of_get_property(slave_node, "phy_id", &lenp); >>> - if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(slave_node)) { >>> + if (slave_data->phy_node) { >>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, >>> + "slave[%d] using phy-handle=\"%s\"\n", >>> + i, slave_data->phy_node->full_name); >>> + } else if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(slave_node)) { >>> struct device_node *phy_node; >>> struct phy_device *phy_dev; >>> >>> /* In the case of a fixed PHY, the DT node associated >>> * to the PHY is the Ethernet MAC DT node. >>> */ >>> ret = of_phy_register_fixed_link(slave_node); >>> @@ -2067,15 +2074,17 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_platform_data *data, >>> if (!mdio) { >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing mdio platform device\n"); >>> return -EINVAL; >>> } >>> snprintf(slave_data->phy_id, sizeof(slave_data->phy_id), >>> PHY_ID_FMT, mdio->name, phyid); >>> } else { >>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No slave[%d] phy_id or fixed-link property\n", i); >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, >>> + "No slave[%d] phy_id, phy-handle, or fixed-link property\n", >>> + i); >>> goto no_phy_slave; >>> } >>> slave_data->phy_if = of_get_phy_mode(slave_node); Your change will allow the code to reach this point in case of phy-handle. >>> if (slave_data->phy_if < 0) { >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing or malformed slave[%d] phy-mode property\n", >>> i); >>> return slave_data->phy_if; >>> >> >> -- regards, -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html