Hi Martin,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Martin Sperl <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20.04.2016 08:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:29 PM, <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Martin Sperl <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Use platform_get_irq_byname to allow for correct mapping of
>>> interrupts to dma channels.
>>>
>>> The currently implemented device tree is unfortunately
>>> implemented with the wrong assumption, that each dma-channel
>>> has its own dma channel, but dma-irq 11 is handling
>>> dma-channel 11-14 and dma-irq 12 is actually a "catch all"
>>> interrupt.
>>>
>>> So here we use the byname variant and require that interrupts
>>> are explicitly named via the interrupts-name property in the
>>
>> interrupt-names
>
> Vinod has just merged this patch - do you want me to submit another
Yeah, that's how I noticed by accident :-)
> to correct those?
For the commit message it's indeed too late. For the error message in the
code, yes please.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
