On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:29 PM, <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Martin Sperl <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Use platform_get_irq_byname to allow for correct mapping of > interrupts to dma channels. > > The currently implemented device tree is unfortunately > implemented with the wrong assumption, that each dma-channel > has its own dma channel, but dma-irq 11 is handling > dma-channel 11-14 and dma-irq 12 is actually a "catch all" > interrupt. > > So here we use the byname variant and require that interrupts > are explicitly named via the interrupts-name property in the interrupt-names > device tree. > > The use of shared interrupts is also implemented. You're not explicitly looking for "dma-shared-all" for that? You might as well just declare a single unnamed interrupt in the bindings. > + /* legacy device tree case handling */ > + dev_warn_once(&pdev->dev, > + "missing interrupts-names property in device tree - legacy interpretation is used"); interrupt-names Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html