On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 03:44:34PM +0100, Cyrille Pitchen wrote: > Hi all, > > Since the framework is named spi-nor, what about spi-nor-4byte-opcodes? > Is it okay for everyone? > > It would follow the same pattern as spi-max-frequency which applies to all SPI > devices. "spi-nor-" as a prefix seems better, thanks. I'm still not confident we've settled the discussion on the need for this property. I really don't like having a mixture of ways to specify the same thing, so if we can avoid it in any way (e.g., by just being more specific about device names), then I'd probably prefer that. Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
