On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 04:43:41PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote: > Yes, I see your point. In looking at the regulator drivers, I interpret > those as being controlled by the driver whereas this chip is passively > reporting status. If the device isn't doing regulation it's not a regulator. > After reading the referenced document, I agree that hwmon probably isn't > appropriate. However, the regulator doesn't seem appropriate either (the > only status appears to be tied to battery properties). We report status for regulators but that's tied to monitoring that's built into a device that does regulation. How about IIO or power supply?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
