On 22/02/16 18:42, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [160222 02:16]: >> On 20/02/16 00:04, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> [160219 13:27]: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> @Tony >>>> Patches 15 and 24 are new and will need your review. >>>> I've modified patch 22 to include the new am335x boards introduced since v4.4. >>>> >>>> Patches are based on top of omap-for-v4.6/dt so that the DT changes apply cleanly. >>> >>> Looks OK to me. Can we merge the dts changes separately? Otherwise >>> we will easily end up with tons of conflicts.. >> >> I agree. But we just need to keep in mind that NAND functionality will be >> broken till all the patches in this series are merged. We don't maintain >> backward compatibility with the old DT implementation. > > Please let's not do that! That breaks booting and git bisect. > It's better to have a minimal branch where each patch boots fine. Understood. I'll send out a patch set with only the minimal DT changes that doesn't break anything. This should be a preparatory step for the DT clean up. > > Also, I think you should at least print a warning for the old > binding. Otherwise people with out of tree boards will have > hard time updating their patches to send to mainline tree. OK. I'll add this warning mechanism to the omap-gpmc driver. cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
