Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: r8a7794: add sound support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/12/2016 09:43 PM, Simon Horman wrote:

Sorry for my un-ordered response

Define the generic R8A7794 part of  the sound device node.
This sound device  is a complex one and comprises the Audio Clock Generator
(ADG), Sampling Rate Converter Unit (SCU), Serial Sound Interface [Unit]
(SSI[U]), and Audio DMAC-Peripheral-Peripheral.
It is up  to the board file to enable the device.

This patch is based on the R8A7791 sound work by Kuninori Morimoto.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
(snip)
+		rcar_sound,src {
+			src1: src@1 {
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 353 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				dmas = <&audma0 0x87>, <&audma0 0x9c>;
+				dma-names = "rx", "tx";
+			};
+			src2: src@2 {
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 354 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				dmas = <&audma0 0x89>, <&audma0 0x9e>;
+				dma-names = "rx", "tx";
+			};
+			src3: src@3 {
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 355 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				dmas = <&audma0 0x8b>, <&audma0 0xa0>;
+				dma-names = "rx", "tx";
+			};
+			src4: src@4 {
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 356 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				dmas = <&audma0 0x8d>, <&audma0 0xb0>;
+				dma-names = "rx", "tx";
+			};
+			src5: src@5 {
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 357 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				dmas = <&audma0 0x8f>, <&audma0 0xb2>;
+				dma-names = "rx", "tx";
+			};
+			src6: src@6 {
+				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 358 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+				dmas = <&audma0 0x91>, <&audma0 0xb4>;
+				dma-names = "rx", "tx";
+			};
+		};

I think this can't work correctly, because driver is assuming
DT has all channles (from 0). (see linux/sound/soc/sh/rcar/src.c :: rsnd_src_probe)
Can you adds dummy src0 with some comments ? or fix src.c driver ?

I would prefer the driver to be fixed (I had a similar patchset locally
and I found it doesn't work).

    You mean you had R8A7794 sound patch set too?

Yes, I was working on it recently.
I suppose we should coordinate these things in future to avoid
duplicated effort.

   Yes, seems a good idea now. :-)

The reason is that DT should describe
the hardware rather than the current state of the software.

    Yes, of course. Just tell me do I have to fix the driver *before* this
patch set is accepted?

I did not entirely get to the bottom of the problem, but I think that at
the very least something needs to be done about the for_each_rsnd_src()
loop in rsnd_src_probe.

   It's not that it replies to my question. :-)
   So you're looking at this issue yourself?

My, obviously not satisfactory, hack around there being no src0 was as follows.

diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/src.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/src.c
index 68b439ed22d7..58a447b0785b 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/src.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/src.c
@@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ int rsnd_src_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,

  	for_each_rsnd_src(src, priv, i) {

Which tree is this? The recent devel branch of renesas.git has for_each_child_of_node() here...

  		snprintf(name, RSND_SRC_NAME_SIZE, "%s.%d",
-			 SRC_NAME, i);
+			 SRC_NAME, i + 1);

  		clk = devm_clk_get(dev, name);
  		if (IS_ERR(clk))

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux