On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 11:38 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:58:13PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:26 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:40:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > > > But the mtk-iommu depend on the drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c(mtk-iommu > > > > has called a function of the mtk-smi). > > > > So if there is dependence here, How should we do to merge them? > > > > > > I can surely merge mtk-smi too, if it gets proper Reviewed-by and > > > Acked-by tags from the maintainer(s). > > > > > > > > > Joerg > > > > > Hi Joerg, > > > > About the driver/memory/, We don't know who is his maintainer. > > MAINTAINERS file don't have drivers/memory maintainer. > > From the history in drivers/memory/ it looks like most of the > > drivers land with an ack from the architecture maintainer. > > And Matthias Brugger is our "ARM/Mediatek SoC support" maintainer. > > > > Then do you mean that we need Matthias's ACK or whom others? > > Yes, I think the sub-architecture maintainer's ACK is probably going to > be as good as it gets. Historically drivers/memory hasn't had enough of > a common ground to instate a framework. > > Thierry Got it. Thanks very much for your reply. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
