On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:58:13PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:26 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:40:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > > But the mtk-iommu depend on the drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c(mtk-iommu > > > has called a function of the mtk-smi). > > > So if there is dependence here, How should we do to merge them? > > > > I can surely merge mtk-smi too, if it gets proper Reviewed-by and > > Acked-by tags from the maintainer(s). > > > > > > Joerg > > > Hi Joerg, > > About the driver/memory/, We don't know who is his maintainer. > MAINTAINERS file don't have drivers/memory maintainer. > From the history in drivers/memory/ it looks like most of the > drivers land with an ack from the architecture maintainer. > And Matthias Brugger is our "ARM/Mediatek SoC support" maintainer. > > Then do you mean that we need Matthias's ACK or whom others? Yes, I think the sub-architecture maintainer's ACK is probably going to be as good as it gets. Historically drivers/memory hasn't had enough of a common ground to instate a framework. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
