Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] edac: Document Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Oct 31, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 10/30, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> 
>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> 
>>> On 10/30/13 14:56, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/30/13 14:45, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>>>> +l2-cache node containing the following properties:
>>>>>> Is the L1 interrupt not per core L1 cache (even if they are OR together at PIC)?
>>>>> Yes it is per CPU. That is what the 0xf part of the cpus interrupts
>>>>> property is showing.
>>>> Than why not have it in each cpu node?
>>> 
>>> Because that duplicates things unnecessarily? The cpus node can hold
>>> things that are common to all CPUs to avoid duplication. If it was a
>>> different PPI for each CPU then I would agree that we need to put it in
>>> each cpu node.
>> 
>> Ok, I'll accept that as the binding is specific to Krait (and I assume all SoCs w/Krait wire this up to a common interrupt)
>> 
> 
> Can I take that as an ack? I'll resend with the s/an/a/ fix
> today.

Yes, you can take that as an ack.

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux