Hi Krzysztof/Ulf/Kukjin On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22.10.2015 00:01, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas >> <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hello Alim, >>> >>> On 10/21/2015 04:50 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>>> >>>>> [0]: >>>>> From c9b250ee03bae338339b70693e906145c719f783 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>> From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:59:44 +0200 >>>>> Subject: [RFT PATCH] mmc: pwrseq: Use highest priority for eMMC restart >>>>> handler >>>>> >>>>> The pwrseq_emmc driver does a eMMC card reset before a system reboot to >>>>> allow broken or limited ROM boot-loaders, that don't have an eMMC reset >>>>> logic, to be able to read the second stage from the eMMC. >>>>> >>>>> But this has to be called before a system reboot handler and while most >>>>> of them use the priority 128, there are other restart handlers (such as >>>>> the syscon-reboot one) that use a higher priority. So, use the highest >>>>> priority to make sure that the eMMC hw is reset before a system reboot. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>> Looks good. >>>> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>> > > +Cc Ulf, > > Javier, > > First of all, thanks Javier for digging into the issue. Actually I have > Odroid U3 but because of user-space limitations (which I need for other > work) I cannot test all of mainline patches there. > > >>> Thanks, should I post it as a proper patch or are adding it to your >>> series? >> Suggest you to post as a patch collecting {Tested, Reviewed}-by (easy >> for maintainers to pickup ) and probably CCing Ulf for his feedback. >> >>> I think the latter is more reasonable so with an ack from Ulf, >>> all patches can go through the linux-samsung tree. >>> >> yes, that is reasonable, as I said, let Krzysztof and Ulf take a call here. > > Javier, Alim, Ulf, > > I am not grabbing any more patches for v4.4 because I doubt that they > could be merged to arm-soc for this cycle. My last pull requests for > v4.4 is still pending... > > This means that I plan to pick up these series for v4.5, after closing > v4.4 merge window (unless Kukjin picks it also). Because of that, we > have plenty of time, so my idea is: > 1. Wait for some comments from Ulf on Javier's fix. > 2. If the fix goes into v4.4, then problem solved. > 3. If not and it get acked, then it can go with this set. > 4. If not and it get applied by Ulf for v4.5, then a tag from him would > be a nice way to solve dependency. > > Either way we don't have to hurry, I think. > Is It the right time to get this series in? Thanks!! > Best regards, > Krzysztof -- Regards, Alim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html