Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:22:06PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> > Experimental bindings could be a suitable temporary measure, but perhaps
> > other, better solutions exist.
> 
> Yes, unstable bindings are part of the currently-documented plan. You are
> not expected to need it as a matter of course, but that facility will
> exist.

I know I'm going to be told to wait for the plan but...

Can you elaborate on the notion of "not expected to need [unstable
bindings] as a matter of course"?

-Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux