Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:38:16PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:22:06PM -0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >>
> >> > Experimental bindings could be a suitable temporary measure, but
> >> perhaps
> >> > other, better solutions exist.
> >>
> >> Yes, unstable bindings are part of the currently-documented plan. You
> >> are
> >> not expected to need it as a matter of course, but that facility will
> >> exist.
> >
> > Can you point me to the documented plan? I must have missed it.
> 
> It's not quite out there yet.
> 
> It was thrashed out in the ARM summit yesterday, and Grant and I will be
> polishing the draft tonight before presenting it to the Kernel Summit
> tomorrow.

Okay, that's great. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to
help push this forward.

Thierry

Attachment: pgpUBOqLkMbQ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux