Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, David Woodhouse wrote:

> 
> > So it is time IMHO that the description of how things *shall* work be
> > itself revised.
> 
> It *is* being revised, with an explicit explicit understanding that things
> will have to change and a defined process for how to cope with that.

Good.

Your previous emails seemed to imply that the lack of binding stability 
enforcement was the problem.

And you said: "our defined processes for coping are based on the 
assumption that it (mistakes) should be rare". I think this statement is 
wrong.  So if this is what's being revised then fine.



Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux