On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So I think I'd ask you to recommend a name, should we just us 'hwspinlock'. The general view from ePAPR and dts is the node name should be a bit more generic (like ethernet or pci). So what would you suggest? > > How about 'hwlock' ? > > This should be generic enough to cover all instances of hardware locks > (we already know hwspinlock isn't generic enough, as there are some > mutex-like hardware locks which doesn't require busy looping). hwlock sounds good to me, I'll go with it. - k -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
