On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So I think I'd ask you to recommend a name, should we just us 'hwspinlock'. The general view from ePAPR and dts is the node name should be a bit more generic (like ethernet or pci). So what would you suggest? How about 'hwlock' ? This should be generic enough to cover all instances of hardware locks (we already know hwspinlock isn't generic enough, as there are some mutex-like hardware locks which doesn't require busy looping). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
