Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ARM: dts: Move display-timimg information inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Kukjin,

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5 August 2013 15:34, Vikas Sajjan <sajjan.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi Vikas,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 30 of July 2013 16:49:32 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
>>>> As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes
>>>> sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for
>>>> exynos5250
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts |   29
>>>> ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13
>>>> deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb
>>>> 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>>> @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@
>>>>               pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>;
>>>>       };
>>>>
>>>> -     display-timings {
>>>> -             native-mode = <&timing0>;
>>>> -             timing0: timing@0 {
>>>> -                     /* 1280x800 */
>>>> -                     clock-frequency = <50000>;
>>>> -                     hactive = <1280>;
>>>> -                     vactive = <800>;
>>>> -                     hfront-porch = <4>;
>>>> -                     hback-porch = <4>;
>>>> -                     hsync-len = <4>;
>>>> -                     vback-porch = <4>;
>>>> -                     vfront-porch = <4>;
>>>> -                     vsync-len = <4>;
>>>> +     fimd@14400000 {
>>>> +             status = "okay";
>>>> +             display-timings {
>>>> +                     native-mode = <&timing0>;
>>>> +                     timing0: timing@0 {
>>>> +                             /* 1280x800 */
>>>> +                             clock-frequency = <50000>;
>>>> +                             hactive = <1280>;
>>>> +                             vactive = <800>;
>>>> +                             hfront-porch = <4>;
>>>> +                             hback-porch = <4>;
>>>> +                             hsync-len = <4>;
>>>> +                             vback-porch = <4>;
>>>> +                             vfront-porch = <4>;
>>>> +                             vsync-len = <4>;
>>>> +                     };
>>>>               };
>>>>       };
>>>
>>> Looks good to me, but I would like some other people from the device tree
>>> mailing list to comment on node naming: Do we want to conform to the
>>> recommendation of ePAPR about node naming, which states that node names
>>> should be generic, not platform specific or we are free to ignore it?
>>>
>>
>> Any more comments on this series.
>
> One trivial typo in patch subject and commit message:
> s/timimg/timing
>

Can you apply this series (by correcting typo s/timimg/timing) OR you
want me to respin V3 with this typo correction.


>
>
> --
> With warm regards,
> Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux