Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] ARM: dts: Move display-timimg information inside FIMD DT node for exynos5250

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5 August 2013 15:34, Vikas Sajjan <sajjan.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Vikas,
>>
>> On Tuesday 30 of July 2013 16:49:32 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
>>> As the display-timing information is parsed by FIMD driver, it makes
>>> sense to move the display-timimg DT node inside FIMD DT node for
>>> exynos5250
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts |   29
>>> ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13
>>> deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts index 49f18c2..d176dbb
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts
>>> @@ -262,19 +262,22 @@
>>>               pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>;
>>>       };
>>>
>>> -     display-timings {
>>> -             native-mode = <&timing0>;
>>> -             timing0: timing@0 {
>>> -                     /* 1280x800 */
>>> -                     clock-frequency = <50000>;
>>> -                     hactive = <1280>;
>>> -                     vactive = <800>;
>>> -                     hfront-porch = <4>;
>>> -                     hback-porch = <4>;
>>> -                     hsync-len = <4>;
>>> -                     vback-porch = <4>;
>>> -                     vfront-porch = <4>;
>>> -                     vsync-len = <4>;
>>> +     fimd@14400000 {
>>> +             status = "okay";
>>> +             display-timings {
>>> +                     native-mode = <&timing0>;
>>> +                     timing0: timing@0 {
>>> +                             /* 1280x800 */
>>> +                             clock-frequency = <50000>;
>>> +                             hactive = <1280>;
>>> +                             vactive = <800>;
>>> +                             hfront-porch = <4>;
>>> +                             hback-porch = <4>;
>>> +                             hsync-len = <4>;
>>> +                             vback-porch = <4>;
>>> +                             vfront-porch = <4>;
>>> +                             vsync-len = <4>;
>>> +                     };
>>>               };
>>>       };
>>
>> Looks good to me, but I would like some other people from the device tree
>> mailing list to comment on node naming: Do we want to conform to the
>> recommendation of ePAPR about node naming, which states that node names
>> should be generic, not platform specific or we are free to ignore it?
>>
>
> Any more comments on this series.

One trivial typo in patch subject and commit message:
s/timimg/timing



-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux