Hi Grant, > On Oct 18, 2017, at 15:14 , Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Bird, Timothy <Tim.Bird@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From Geert Uytterhoeven on Tuesday, October 17, 2017 10:24 AM >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I think this also gets to having bindings described in a structured way so >>> they can be utilized for validation of dts files. We are doing a little of this in >>> Zephyr since we are using a structured binding spec to generate code from >>> .dts (since we don’t utilize a runtime dtb). >>> >>> So you are basically generating board files from .dts? >>> (closing the loop ;-) >> >> I think we ought to do this on Linux, as a size optimization. >> -- Tim >> >> P.S. I think I'll leave it ambiguous whether this was meant as a joke or not. :-) > As crazy that sounds it is possible using the YAML bindings, i.e. C structure definitions and fill-up from DT automatically. Whether this is a good idea it’s another question :) > Talk to Nicolas Pitre and Rob Herring about this. They've already made > a bunch of progress on reducing memory footprint. > > g. > >> _______________________________________________ >> Ksummit-discuss mailing list >> Ksummit-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-spec" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
