On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Bird, Timothy <Tim.Bird@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From Geert Uytterhoeven on Tuesday, October 17, 2017 10:24 AM >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I think this also gets to having bindings described in a structured way so >> they can be utilized for validation of dts files. We are doing a little of this in >> Zephyr since we are using a structured binding spec to generate code from >> .dts (since we don’t utilize a runtime dtb). >> >> So you are basically generating board files from .dts? >> (closing the loop ;-) > > I think we ought to do this on Linux, as a size optimization. > -- Tim > > P.S. I think I'll leave it ambiguous whether this was meant as a joke or not. :-) Talk to Nicolas Pitre and Rob Herring about this. They've already made a bunch of progress on reducing memory footprint. g. > _______________________________________________ > Ksummit-discuss mailing list > Ksummit-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-spec" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
