[PATCH] fdt_rw.c: Fix Unchecked return value error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Fixed "Unchecked return value" error, by adding "(void)" in front of the
function call.

When Coverity Scan was ran on some of your code, a "Unchecked return value"
error was found at line 352 in fdt_rw.c. For similar errors that we received
for RTEMS, we created a macro that will assert the value returned and "use" the
return value with (void).

Signed-off-by: Ryan Long <ryan.long@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c b/cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
index 1385425..cdae5dd 100644
--- a/cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
+++ b/cpukit/dtc/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ int fdt_add_subnode_namelen(void *fdt, int parentoffset,
 		return offset;
 
 	/* Try to place the new node after the parent's properties */
-	fdt_next_tag(fdt, parentoffset, &nextoffset); /* skip the BEGIN_NODE */
+	(void) fdt_next_tag(fdt, parentoffset, &nextoffset); /* skip the BEGIN_NODE */
 	do {
 		offset = nextoffset;
 		tag = fdt_next_tag(fdt, offset, &nextoffset);
-- 
1.8.3.1




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux