Ceph Leadership Team meeting 2024-03-13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Topics discussed:

- a noticeable backlog of "make check" jobs and shaman builds
  (>6 hours)
  - mostly self-inflicted because folks have been retriggering "make
    check" a lot recently in the hopes of working around a number of
    transient failures
  - even more so if the pool of jenkins workers used for "make check"
    and shaman builds is the same
    - Laura will confirm in the infra meeting

- Patrick will downgrade github org owners that aren't active to
  regular members

- proposal to prune down the list of individuals with write access to
  ceph.git repo (Patrick)
  - component leads and long-time senior contributors only
  - the goal is to enforce our SubmittingPatches.rst rules better
  - also some additional security

- concerns over fractured issue tracking
  - the most recent example is ceph-nvmeof using github issues, but
    there is also nvmeof subproject on tracker.ceph.com
  - other notable examples are ceph-csi and go-ceph, although there
    hasn't been anything on tracker.ceph.com for these
  - conclusion: github issues or any other issue tracking system is
    fine as long as there is no tight coupling to ceph.git
  - question: does a repo being brought in as a submodule as is the
    case with ceph-nvmeof in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54671
    constitute tight coupling?
    - in this case the submodule is intended to bring in two .proto
      files for use by NVMeofGwMonitorClient daemon, everything else in
      ceph-nvmeof repo shouldn't be looked at
    - is this the best way to do that -- could these files just be
      copied?
    - dashboard already carries a copy of one of them
      (src/pybind/mgr/dashboard/services/proto/gateway.proto)
    - creating a pypy package is another option

- QA nightlies
  - now that they are back, need to ensure they are looked at!
  - poll among component leads: is status quo where all results go to
    ceph-qa list OK or do we need to have teuthology email people/teams
    directly?
  - let's tally up next week

Topics moved to next week:

- 19.1.0 status
- trello to limit free workspaces to 10 collaborators
  - need a replacement for Yuri's board at the very least

Thanks,

                Ilya
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux