On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 5:19 PM John Mulligan <phlogistonjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:58:30 PM EDT Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 9:57 AM John Mulligan <phlogistonjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> ...
> If cephadm is a separate package (for some definition of package) I have to
> wonder why you're *not* working on adding them to Fedora and CentOS Storage
> SIG, where Ceph and several related packages are already being packaged for
> wide consumption.
cephadm is part of the packages. For RPM it is one of the many sub-packages in
ceph.spec.in.
Yeah, my bad. I didn't remember every one of the dozens of subpackages. But there is a cephadm subpackage in the 17.2.6 (and earlier) packages in fedora and centos storage sig. I leapt to an incorrect conclusion when you said you were looking for someplace to distribute cephadm from. The implication seemed to be that it was a completely separate build from the rest of ceph.
Kaleb
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
