On 11/19/2013 04:32 AM, wangweidong wrote:
On 2013/11/19 11:14, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:47:27AM +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 0740f93..83d011e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -1116,6 +1116,10 @@ static struct sock * tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
newtp = tcp_sk(newsk);
memcpy(newnp, np, sizeof(struct ipv6_pinfo));
+ /* Don't forget copy the rcv_saddr and daddr when
+ * copy ipv6_pinfo.
+ */
+ sk_v6_copy_addrs(newsk, sk);
ipv6_addr_set_v4mapped(newinet->inet_daddr, &newsk->sk_v6_daddr);
Hmm, how did you spot this?
Greetings,
Hannes
When I did the lksctp-tools(1.0.15)/src/func_tests/test_getname_v6, I got a Segmentation fault.
So I try to resolve it. I found the sctp_accept will call sctp_v6_create_accept_sk in IPV6,
the function will memcpy the ipv6_pinfo, and not copy the sk_v6_rcv_saddr. But the getsockname
will read the sk_v6_rcv_saddr, and the value is not true.
In SCTP code, "newsk->sk_v6_daddr = oldsk->sk_v6_daddr;" is redundant as it's already
done by "sctp_v6_to_sk_daddr(&asoc->peer.primary_addr, newsk);" for the primary path,
after we're doing the full copy of struct ipv6_pinfo to the new socket in
sctp_v6_create_accept_sk(). I've sent out an updated patch for SCTP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
