On 2013/11/19 11:14, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:47:27AM +0800, Wang Weidong wrote: >> diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c >> index 0740f93..83d011e 100644 >> --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c >> +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c >> @@ -1116,6 +1116,10 @@ static struct sock * tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, >> newtp = tcp_sk(newsk); >> >> memcpy(newnp, np, sizeof(struct ipv6_pinfo)); >> + /* Don't forget copy the rcv_saddr and daddr when >> + * copy ipv6_pinfo. >> + */ >> + sk_v6_copy_addrs(newsk, sk); >> >> ipv6_addr_set_v4mapped(newinet->inet_daddr, &newsk->sk_v6_daddr); >> > > Hmm, how did you spot this? > > Greetings, > > Hannes > When I did the lksctp-tools(1.0.15)/src/func_tests/test_getname_v6, I got a Segmentation fault. So I try to resolve it. I found the sctp_accept will call sctp_v6_create_accept_sk in IPV6, the function will memcpy the ipv6_pinfo, and not copy the sk_v6_rcv_saddr. But the getsockname will read the sk_v6_rcv_saddr, and the value is not true. > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
