Dave, - | > Summing up, I have doubts that basing CCID-3 will bring advantages and | > would much rather go the other way and (consistently) use lower resolution. | > | > Thoughts? | | I wouldn't bother with high resolution timers, mostly because they are more | expensive and the benefit of them here is at best "unknown". | Thanks a lot for the reply. I am glad for this suggestion, since it will allow simpler code while at the same time still supporting a basic, working implementation of CCID-3. If people want to experiment with higher-resolution timers (as per other replies), this can be put into an experimental subtree on eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk. If it is okay with Leandro and Tommi, it would finally also make it possible to sort out consolidating the CCID-3/CCID-4 code. Thanks again, Gerrit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
