On 7/20/07, Patrick <patrick.andrieux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Applying only patch #1 doesn't work... patch #2 correct the error. PerfSocket.cpp: In function 'void MakeSocket(thread_Settings*)': PerfSocket.cpp:89: error: 'IPPROTO_UDPLITE' was not declared in this scope make[2]: *** [PerfSocket.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/iperf-2.0.2/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/iperf-2.0.2' make: *** [all] Error 2 It could be good to not have 2 iperf dccp patched version, one Ian patched, one Gerrit patched ?
I agree. I think only thing missing from Gerrit's is my continuous patch which should apply on top of his I'm guessing. I might just go do some iperf hacking now and see what I can find... Ian -- Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/ Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz WAND Network Research Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
