On 05/23/2011 10:15 AM, Lorenzo M. Catucci wrote:
> On 05/22/2011 09:20 PM, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
>> [...]
>> I've updated my RHEL bug to include a link to your patch - hopefully
>> we can
>> get it included upstream (especially if one of them applies cleanly
>> to 2.1.22).
>>
>
> Amir,
> I just checked the 2.1.23 patch applies with just some line shift
> to 2.1.22.
> [...]
Just to let all know that the ...2.1.23 patch is working well on an old
production system of ours,
with a patched 2.1.22 version.
Thank you all, yours
lorenzo
