Re: not sure if this a relevant article for this group-might be of interest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Max Vozeler <max@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 08:35:42PM +0200, markus reichelt wrote:
> > * rodger ellis <rellis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.kernel/browse_thread/thread/b53dfc2c858687a0/4a5993178f83bb67
> > 
> > It certainly is of interest to Max Vozeler, and all Debian users
> > lurking; it definitely complicates things for Debian users.
> 
> This is not actually a fundamental problem with the Debian kernel,
> or other kernels configured with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m.

I misinterpreted the report as: loop-AES no longer works with
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m under Debian.

One of the drawbacks of a package system; users trust it too much
when they fiddle with their system. 

Does the Debian loop-AES package contain loop-AES modules and patched
util-linux? If so, then how do people still manage to confuse things
like that?

-- 
left blank, right bald

Attachment: pgpeUq1MQ9Suz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Linux Crypto]     [Gnu Crypto]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux