-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jari Ruusu wrote:
| |>Every example I see in the docs uses AES128. Is there a reason not to use |>AES256? (Of cource AES-128 will be secure for some time, but this is a reason |>pro aes-128 and not against aes-256, because AES-256 is also for some time ;) | | | AES128 is a little bit faster than AES256 |
Does anyone happen to have any data illustrating roughly what the speed differences are? Looking for graphs without having to do the analysis myself if I can help it! :-)
Wren
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCAOynA/qR4Uok1vQRAqQjAKD6Mib1y+Aw0K/M5GxqpzM1QS1rTACgukwc yMQwCgyjL6nkgpbL+jPKisM= =7Zi5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
