-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Petersen schrieb: >> >> I use AES128 myself. >> > So that's <safe>? there is no "safe" and "unsafe". 256bit AES is "safer than" 128bit AES and ROT-13 is probably "safer than" plaintext-hidden-under-your-chair. consider the importance of your data, the amount of cpu-power (aka "money") of the people trying to get your plaintext and your willingnes to exchange cipher-bits for speed..then you'll get a figure of what you can consider "safe" for your system. i'm using AES128bit too, and Jari "Mr. loop-aes" Ruusu also uses 128bit AES too...it can't be that unsafe, can it? Christian. - -- BOFH excuse #47: Complete Transient Lockout -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCDALD+A7rjkF8z0wRAvvQAJ9Ey/l8P+k4fcEF/L2NoscCY6hZegCgt4NP zEck95PunAuxVBdRxSSb1a0= =xYeT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
