Petersen wrote: > I made a drive using this setup: > > offset=8192 encryption=AES256 multi-key-v3 > > Now, throughput on my rather weak Linux-running pentium 200MHz fell when > upgrading from plain v1-AES128. This is not surprising; however > multikey-v3 also eats more processing power, am I right? multikey v2 and v3 eat more processing power than v1. AES256 eats more processing power than AES128. > Is AES128 safe enough in your mind Jari; I see you use it in your > examples in the README. I use AES128 myself. > Downgrading would give me better performance I suppose. Yep. -- Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
