On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, jerome etienne wrote:
Peter_22@xxxxxx wrote:
In case there are more complaints concerning loop-aes everyone is free to launch either fixes or reveal urls with something better at hand. It should be: [...]
security isnt part of your requirement ?
If the alternatives are so cumbersome, inflexible, unstable and unusable, then its pointless if its the most secure in the universe -- nobody will
use it anyway.
i likely miss something. why using a encrypted fs if security isnt part of your requirement ?
- Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
