On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, jerome etienne wrote: > i likely miss something. why using a encrypted fs if security isnt part > of your requirement ? if the security you get is "good enough" (for that user's purposes, and i'm sorry but you cannot be omniscient and know or dictate that to them), they will use it. also there is nothing better at the moment (that is usable). as i said, if the alternative is unusable, whats the point? something is better than nothing at all. -Dan - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
