On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R wrote: > b) IV problem: well this can easily be worked around by issuing a mkfs > command specifying a block size which is conducive (4096 I think, or 512 I > forget which) to the I-patch Fine if you use ext2. Other fs (iso9660) don't support variable block size. > Oh my, look what happened, no more bugs! Can it be? Maybe the I-patch is not > broken! Except that i-patch 2.4 can't read crypto writen by i-patch 2.2, and nobody can quite seem to figure out why... -Dan Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
