On 3 March 2014 09:12, Patrick Palka <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -Wmissing-prototypes warns when a non-static function is defined > before a corresponding prototype (usually inside an included header > file) is declared. In such a case, it is impossible to reference the > non-static function from another file, and therefore the function > should be marked static (usually). Hope that makes sense! I understand that it should be made static as we don't have a prototype in any other header file, but I thought we shouldn't get the warning we are getting. warning: no previous prototype for 'show_boost' Because we have prototype/definition of function before it is used. Maybe a warning like: local function should be marked static could have been there ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
