Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: cpufreq: Mark function as static in cpufreq.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:08:26PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote:
> Mark function as static in cpufreq.c because it is not
> used outside this file.
> 
> This eliminates the following warning in cpufreq.c:
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:355:9: warning: no previous prototype for ‘show_boost’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@xxxxxxxxx>

I don't see any uses of this function in cpufreq.c; have uses appeared
in a development branch?

>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 08ca8c9..54fd670 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_notify_post_transition);
>  /*********************************************************************
>   *                          SYSFS INTERFACE                          *
>   *********************************************************************/
> -ssize_t show_boost(struct kobject *kobj,
> +static ssize_t show_boost(struct kobject *kobj,
>  				 struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux